Human Rights Committee

The Human Rights Committee is a body of 18 independent experts that monitors the implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and its Protocols.

State reporting procedure:

Under article 40 of ICCPR, States parties must submit reports every five years on measures taken to implement ICCPR. The reports are examined by the Committee in public sessions, through a dialogue with State representatives. On the final day of each session, the Committee adopts concluding "observations" summarizing its main concerns and making appropriate suggestions and recommendations to the State party.

Amongst its observations or "views", the Committee has called on States to:

 

Although only members of the Committee and representatives of the relevant State party may take part in the dialogue, non-governmental organizations are encouraged to submit written information or reports to the Committee prior to each state's examination, and REDRESS often works together with local organisations to make such submissions.  Further detailed information about the procedure and upcoming deadlines is available on the website of the Centre for Civil and Political Rights - an organisation which facilitates NGO engagement with the Committee.


Individual Complaints:

The first Optional Protocol to the Covenant allows individuals to submit complaints to the Human Rights Committee. The Committee has adopted detailed Rules of Procedure which set out the complaint process. Model complaint forms are also available. The conditions for admissibility are very similar to other mechanisms.

Admissibility: For a complaint to be admissible:

 

Merits: Once a communication has been declared admissible, the Committee asks the State concerned to explain or clarify the problem and to indicate whether anything has been done to settle it. A time limit of six months is set for the State party's reply. The author of the complaint then has an opportunity to comment on the State's reply. In a number of cases dealing with the right to life, torture and ill-treatment, and arbitrary arrests and disappearances, the Committee has established that the burden of proof cannot rest alone with the person complaining of the violation of rights and freedoms. The Committee also views a refutation in general terms of a complaint of a violation of a person's human rights as insufficient. Once the inquiry is completed, the Committee expresses its final views and sends them to the State concerned and to the author.

Interim protection: Given the lengthy period of time from when the claim is initially filed to when it is ultimately decided, the Committee instituted a procedure for interim protection - to ensure that urgent requests are dealt with expeditiously. There have been cases, for example, in which the Committee has advised against a threatened expulsion, requested the suspension of a death sentence or drawn attention to the need for an urgent medical examination.

Decisions: The Committee issues final decisions, which States Parties are obliged to follow. The Committee has urged State parties to investigate allegations of ill-treatment in detention, and in cases of disappearances, to establish the truth of what has happened and to bring to justice any persons found to be responsible. The Committee has noted the obligation to and to prosecute criminally, try and punish those held responsible for violations under the Covenant, to grant appropriate compensation to victims and afford all necessary medical care. In some instances, it has called for the immediate release of persons wrongfully detained. Importantly, the Committee has called on State parties to take effective measures in order to ensure that similar violations do not occur in the future.

Follow up: The Human Rights Committee has requested from State parties information on any relevant measures taken by the State party in respect of the Committee's decisions. In 1990, the Committee instituted a mechanism to assist it in monitoring more closely whether States parties have given effect to its final decisions on the merits, and cooperation from States parties has been encouraging.


Back to Top

Where We Work

Blog

Victims Rights Working Groups

Criminal Law Reform in Sudan

Website by Adept